Paper detail

Dusty torus formation by anisotropic radiative pressure feedback of active galactic nuclei

The feedback by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is significant for the formation and evolution of galaxies. It has been realized that the radiative pressure feedback could be an efficient mechanism due to the existence of dust. In this Letter, we discuss the effect of anisotropic radiative pressure, which is inevitable if the UV/optical emission arises from an accretion disk. The distribution of dusty gas should be also anisotropic due to the influence of the anisotropic disk radiation, i.e. the dust in the face-on direction of an accretion disk can be blown out relatively more easily, whereas the dust can survive in the edge-on direction. This result can explain the presence of some obscured AGNs with high Eddington ratios and can also quantitatively reproduce the observed decreasing fraction of type 2 AGNs with increasing luminosity. A sequence of AGN formation and evolution is also proposed, within the context of the formation, evolution and exhaustion of the dusty torus. Our model predicts the existence of bright AGNs with dusty tori, but without broad line regions. Finally we discuss the implications of the anisotropic radiation for the calculations of luminosity functions and radiation efficiencies of AGNs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.