Paper detail

Dust Polarization From Starlight Data

We present a statistical analysis of the interstellar medium (ISM) polarization from the largest compilation available of starlight data, which comprises ~ 5500 stars. The measured correlation between the mean polarization degree and extinction indicates that ISM dust grains are not fully aligned with the uniform component of the large-scale Galactic magnetic field. Moreover, we estimate the ratio of the uniform to the random plane-of-the-sky components of the magnetic field to be B_u/B_r = 0.8. From the analysis of starlight polarization degree and position angle we find that the magnetic field broadly follows Galactic structures on large-scales. On the other hand, the angular power spectrum C_l of the polarization degree for Galactic plane data is found to be consistent with a power-law, C_l ~ l^{-1.5} (where l = 180 deg/θis the multipole order), for angular scales θ> 10 arcmin. We argue that this data set can be used to estimate diffuse polarized emission at microwave frequencies.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.