Paper detail

Dust-obscured star formation and the contribution of galaxies escaping UV/optical color selections at z~2

A substantial fraction of the stellar mass growth across cosmic time occurred within dust-enshrouded environments. Yet, the exact amount of star-forming activity that took place in high-redshift dusty galaxies currently missed by optical surveys has been barely explored. Using the Spitzer observations of COSMOS we determined the fraction of luminous star-forming galaxies at 1.5<z<3 escaping the traditional color selection techniques because of dust extinction, as well as their contribution to the cosmic star formation density at high redshift. We find that the BzK criterion offers an almost complete (~90%) identification of the 24mic sources at 1.4<z<2.5, while the BM/BX criterion miss 50% of the MIPS population. Similarly the criterion based on the presence of a stellar bump in massive sources (so-called "IRAC peakers") miss up to 40% of the IR luminosity density and only 25% of the IR energy density at z~2 is produced by Optically-Faint IR-bright galaxies selected based on their extreme mid-IR to optical flux ratios. We conclude that color selections of distant star-forming galaxies must be used with lots of care given the substantial bias they can suffer. In particular, the effect of dust extinction strongly impacts the completeness of identifications at the bright end of the bolometric luminosity function, which implies large and uncertain extrapolations to account for the contribution of dusty galaxies missed by these selections. In the context of forthcoming facilities that will operate at long wavelengths (e.g., $JWST$, ALMA, SAFARI, EVLA, SKA), this emphasizes the importance of minimizing the extinction biases when probing the activity of star formation in the early Universe.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.