Paper detail

Dust in Protoplanetary Disks: A Clue as to the Critical Mass of Planetary Cores

Dust in protoplanetary disks is recognized as the building blocks of planets. In the core accretion scenario, the abundance of dust in disks (or metallicity) is crucial for forming cores of gas giants. We present our recent progress on the relationship between the metallicity and planet formation, wherein planet formation frequencies (PFFs) as well as the critical mass of planetary cores ($M_{c,crit}$) that can initiate gas accretion are statistically examined. We focus on three different planetary populations that are prominent for observed exoplanets in the mass-semimajor axis diagram: hot Jupiters, exo-Jupiters that are densely populated around 1 AU, and low-mass planets in tight orbits. We show that the resultant PFFs for both Jovian planets are correlated positively with the metallicity whereas low-mass planets form efficiently for a wide range of metallicities. This is consistent with the observed Planet-Metallicity correlation. Examining the statistically averaged value of $M_{c,crit}$ (defined as $<M_{c,crit}>$), we find that the correlation originates from the behavior of $<M_{c,crit}>$ that increases steadily with metallicity for two kinds of the Jovian planets while the low-mass planets obtain a rather constant value for $<M_{c,crit}>$. Such a difference in $<M_{c,crit}>$ can define transition metallicities (TMs) above which the Jovian planets gain a larger value of $<M_{c,crit}>$ than the low-mass planets, and hence gas giant formation takes place more efficiently. We find that TMs are sensitive to the important parameter that involves $M_{c,crit}$. We show, by comparing with the observations, that a most likely value of $M_{c,crit}$ is $\simeq 5M_{\oplus}$, which is smaller than the conventional value in the literature ($\simeq 10M_{\oplus}$). Our results suggest that opacities in planetary atmospheres play an important role for lowering $M_{c,crit}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.