Paper detail

Dust coagulation and fragmentation in a collapsing cloud core and their influence on non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects

We determine the time evolution of the dust particle size distribution during the collapse of a cloud core, accounting for both dust coagulation and dust fragmentation, to investigate the influence of dust growth on non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects.The density evolution of the collapsing core is given by a one-zone model. We assume two types of dust model: dust composed only of silicate (silicate dust) and dust with a surface covered by $\mathrm{H_{2}O}$ ice ($\mathrm{H_{2}O}$ ice dust). When only considering collisional coagulation, the non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects are not effective in the high-density region for both the silicate and $\mathrm{H_{2}O}$ ice dust cases. This is because dust coagulation reduces the abundance of small dust particles, resulting in less efficient adsorption of charged particles on the dust surface. For the silicate dust case, when collisional fragmentation is included, the non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects do apply at a high density of $n_{\mathrm{H}}>10^{12} \ \mathrm{cm^{-3}}$ because of the abundant production of small dust particles. On the other hand, for the $\mathrm{H_{2}O}$ ice dust case, the production of small dust particles due to fragmentation is not efficient. Therefore, for the $\mathrm{H_{2}O}$ ice dust case, non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects apply only in the range $n_{\mathrm{H}}\gtrsim 10^{14} \ \mathrm{cm^{-3}}$, even when collisional fragmentation is considered. Our results suggest that it is necessary to consider both dust collisional coagulation and fragmentation to activate non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects, which should play a significant role in the star and disk formation processes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.