Paper detail

Duality of Hoffman constants

We show that a suitable Slater condition implies a duality inequality between the Hoffman constants of the following feasibility problems: $$ \begin{array}{r} Ax-b \in S\\ x \in R \end{array} \qquad\text{ and }\qquad \begin{array}{r} c-A^T y \in R^*\\ y \in S^*. \end{array} $$ where $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, and $R\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ and $S\subseteq \mathbb{R}^m$ are reference polyhedral cones, with respective dual cones $R^*\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ and $S^*\subseteq \mathbb{R}^m$. Our approach relies on an exact characterization of Hoffman constants and introduces a novel Hoffman duality inequality for polyhedral set-valued mappings. These two fundamental results also yield a striking identity between the Hoffman constants of box-constrained feasibility problems, which feature a similar primal-dual structure with a box and a linear subspace as reference sets. Additionally, we establish a surprising identity between the Hoffman constants of box-constrained feasibility problems and the chi condition measures for weighted least-squares problems

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.