Paper detail

Duality between range and no-response tests and its application for inverse problems

In this paper we will show the duality between the range test (RT) and no-response test (NRT) for the inverse boundary value problem for the Laplace equation in $Ω\setminus\overline D$ with an obstacle $D\SubsetΩ$ whose boundary $\partial D$ is visible from the boundary $\partialΩ$ of $Ω$ and a measurement is given as a set of Cauchy data on $\partialΩ$. Here the Cauchy data is given by a unique solution $u$ of the boundary value problem for the Laplace equation in $Ω\setminus\overline D$ with homogeneous and inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition on $\partial D$ and $\partialΩ$, respectively. These testing methods are domain sampling method to estimate the location of the obstacle using test domains and the associated indicator functions. Also both of these testing methods can test the analytic extension of $u$ to the exterior of a test domain. Since these methods are defined via some operators which are dual to each other, we could expect that there is a duality between the two methods. We will give this duality in terms of the equivalence of the pre-indicator functions associated to their indicator functions. As an application of the duality, the reconstruction of $D$ using the RT gives the reconstruction of $D$ using the NRT and vice versa. We will also give each of these reconstructions without using the duality if the Dirichlet data of the Cauchy data on $\partialΩ$ is not identically zero and the solution to the associated forward problem does not have any analytic extension across $\partial D$. Moreover, we will show that these methods can still give the reconstruction of $D$ if $D$ is a convex polygon and it satisfies one of the following two properties: all of its corner angles are irrational and its diameter is less than its distance to $\partialΩ$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.