Paper detail

Dual-Latent Collaborative Decoding for Fidelity-Perception Balanced Image Compression

Learned image compression (LIC) increasingly requires reconstructions that balance distortion fidelity and perceptual realism across a wide range of bitrates. However, most existing methods still rely on a single compressed latent representation to simultaneously carry structural details, semantic cues, and perceptual priors, requiring the same latent representation to serve multiple, potentially conflicting roles. This tension becomes evident across different latent paradigms: scalar-quantized (SQ) continuous latents provide rate-scalable fidelity but tend to lose perceptual details at low rates, while vector-quantized (VQ) discrete tokens preserve compact semantic cues but suffer from limited structural fidelity and bitrate scalability. To address this issue, we propose Mixture of Decoder Experts (MoDE), a dual-latent collaborative decoding framework that decomposes reconstruction responsibilities across complementary latent paradigms. Specifically, MoDE treats the SQ branch as a fidelity-oriented expert and the VQ branch as a perception-oriented expert, and coordinates them through two decoder-side modules: Expert-Specific Enhancement (ESE), which preserves branch-specific expert references, and Cross-Expert Modulation (CEM), which enables selective complementary transfer during reconstruction. The resulting framework supports selective cross-latent collaboration under a shared dual-stream bitstream and enables both fidelity-anchored and perception-anchored decoding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MoDE achieves a more favorable fidelity-perception balance than representative distortion-oriented, perception-oriented, generative, and dual-latent baselines across a wide bitrate range, highlighting decoder-side expert collaboration as an effective design for wide-range fidelity-perception balanced LIC.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.