Paper detail

Dual Decision Improves Open-Set Panoptic Segmentation

Open-set panoptic segmentation (OPS) problem is a new research direction aiming to perform segmentation for both \known classes and \unknown classes, i.e., the objects ("things") that are never annotated in the training set. The main challenges of OPS are twofold: (1) the infinite possibility of the \unknown object appearances makes it difficult to model them from a limited number of training data. (2) at training time, we are only provided with the "void" category, which essentially mixes the "unknown thing" and "background" classes. We empirically find that directly using "void" category to supervise \known class or "background" classifiers without screening will lead to an unsatisfied OPS result. In this paper, we propose a divide-and-conquer scheme to develop a dual decision process for OPS. We show that by properly combining a \known class discriminator with an additional class-agnostic object prediction head, the OPS performance can be significantly improved. Specifically, we first propose to create a classifier with only \known categories and let the "void" class proposals achieve low prediction probability from those categories. Then we distinguish the "unknown things" from the background by using the additional object prediction head. To further boost performance, we introduce "unknown things" pseudo-labels generated from up-to-date models to enrich the training set. Our extensive experimental evaluation shows that our approach significantly improves \unknown class panoptic quality, with more than 30\% relative improvements than the existing best-performed method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.