Paper detail

Drying of agarose gels monitored by in-situ interferometry

Hydrogels behave as viscoelastic soft solids and display a porous microstructure filled with water with typical amounts of 90\%~w/w or more. As such, these materials are highly sensitive to water loss through evaporation, which impacts their mechanical properties. Yet, aside from scattered empirical observations, little is known about the gel drying kinetics for which there is a lack of temporally and spatially resolved measurements. Here we report a benchmark study of the slow drying of agarose gels cast in cylindrical Petri dishes. The weak adhesion of the gel to the lateral wall of the dish guarantees that the gel diameter remains constant during the drying process and that the gel shrinkage is purely vertical. The thinning rate is monitored by in-situ interferometry using a Michelson interferometer. The displacement of interference fringes are analyzed using an original spatiotemporal filtering method, which allows us to measure local thinning rates of about 10~nm/s with high accuracy. Experiments conducted at different positions along the gel radius show that the gel thins locally with a constant velocity before experiencing a sudden collapse at the end of the drying process. We further use the thinning rate measured at the center of the dish during the early stage of the drying process as a robust observable to quantify the role of additives on the gel drying kinetics and compare gels of different compositions. Our work exemplifies interferometry as a powerful tool to quantify the impact of minute amounts of additives on the drying of biopolymer gels.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.