Paper detail

Drying behavior of dense refractory ceramic castables. Part 1 General aspects and experimental techniques used to assess water removal

Despite the continuous evolution on the performance of refractory ceramic products, monolithic materials still require special attention during their processing steps as various phase transformations may take place during the curing, drying and firing stages. Drying is usually the longest and the most critical process observed during the first heating cycle of refractory linings, as the enhanced particle packing and reduced permeability of the resulting microstructure may lead to recurrent explosive spalling and mechanical damage associated with dewatering and the development of high steam pressure at the inner regions of such dense materials. In this context, this review article mainly addresses (i) the theoretical aspects related to the drying process of dense refractories, (ii) the influence of the phase transformations derived from the binder additives, and (iii) the usual and advanced experimental techniques to assess the water removal from consolidated castable pieces. Many studies have pointed out that due to the complex nature of this phenomenon (i.e., considering combined thermal stresses and pore pressure, heterogeneous microstructure, evolving pore structure with temperature, etc.), the mechanisms behind the water withdrawal and castables explosive spalling are lacking further understanding and, consequently, it has been difficult to save time and energy during the first heating of industrial equipment lined with ceramic materials. On the other hand, different methods are used for refractory spalling assessment and many efforts have been carried out in applying in situ imaging techniques (such as NMR and neutron tomography) to follow the moisture evolution during such thermal treatments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.