Paper detail

Drying behavior of dense refractory castables. Part 2 Drying agents and design of heating schedules

Drying is the most critical process of the first heating cycle of monolithic dense refractories, as the reduced permeability of the resulting microstructure may lead to explosive spalling and mechanical damage associated with dewatering. The first part of this review series pointed out the various drying stages, the role of the binder components and the techniques that can be used to follow the water release in as-cast refractory materials, when they are exposed to heat. Although defining a suitable heating schedule is a great challenge, some tools can be applied to minimize the spalling risks associated with steam pressurization. In this context, this second review article points out (i) the main drying agents and how they affect the resulting castables' microstructure (organic fibers, metallic powders, permeability enhancing active compounds, silica-based additives and chelating agents), and (ii) the effects related to the procedures commonly applied during the designing of heating routine (i.e., the role of the heating rate, ramp versus holding time), as well as the influence of the castable's dimension on the overall drying behavior. Considering the recent advances regarding the design of refractory formulations and their processing, one may expect that incorporating suitable drying additives into the prepared composition should lead to a suitable and safer water release in such dense consolidated structures. Besides that, novel engineering opportunities, such as the use of in-situ based experimental techniques (i.e., neutron and X-ray tomography) to obtain more accurate data and the development of numerical models, might help in simulating and predicting the steam pressure developed in refractory systems during their first heating.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.