Paper detail

Drug repurposing for SARS-COV-2: A high-throughput molecular docking, molecular dynamics, machine learning, & ab-initio study

A molecule of dimension 125nm has caused around 479 Million human infections (80M for the USA) & 6.1 Million human deaths (977,000 for the USA) worldwide and slashed the global economy by US$ 8.5 Trillion over two years. The only other events in recent history that caused comparative human life loss through direct usage (either by (wo)man or nature, respectively) of structure-property relations of 'nano-structures' (either (wo)man-made or nature, respectively) were nuclear bomb attacks of Japanese cities by the USA during World War II and 1918 Flu Pandemic. This molecule is SARS-CoV-2, which causes a disease known as COVID-19. The high liability cost of the pandemic had incentivized various private, government, and academic entities to work towards finding a cure for these & emerging diseases. As result, multiple vaccine candidates are discovered to avoid the infection in first place. But so far, there has been no success in finding fully effective therapeutics candidates. In this paper, we attempted to provide multiple therapy candidates based upon a sophisticated multi-scale in-silico framework. We have used the following robust framework to screen the ligands; Step-I: high throughput docking, Step-II: molecular dynamics, Step-III: density functional theory analysis. In total, we have analyzed 2.2 Million unique protein binding site/ligand combinations. The proteins were selected based on recent experimental studies. Step-I had filtered that number down to 10 ligands/protein based on molecular docking binding energy, further screening down to 2 ligands/protein based on drug-likeness analysis. Additionally, these two ligands/proteins were investigated in Step-II with a molecular dynamic based RMSD analysis. It finally suggested three ligands (ZINC1176619532, ZINC517580540, ZINC952855827) attacking different binding sites of the protein(7BV2), which were further analyzed in Step III.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.