Paper detail

Droplet Breakup of the Nematic Liquid Crystal MBBA

Droplet breakup is a well studied phenomena in Newtonian fluids. One property of this behavior is that, independent of initial conditions, the minimum radius exhibits power law scaling with the time left to breakup tau. Because they have additional structure and shear dependent viscosity, liquid crystals pose an interesting complication to such studies. Here, we investigate the breakup of a synthetic nematic liquid crystal known as MBBA. We determine the phase of the solution by using a cross polarizer setup in situ with the liquid bridge breakup apparatus. Consistent with previous studies of scaling behavior in viscous-inertial fluid breakup, when MBBA is in the isotropic phase, the minimum radius decreases as tau^{1.03 \pm 0.04}. In the nematic phase however, we observe very different thinning behavior. Our measurements of the thinning profile are consistent with two interpretations. In the first interpretation, the breakup is universal and consists of two different regimes. The first regime is characterized by a symmetric profile with a single minimum whose radius decreases as tau^{1.51 \pm 0.06}. The second and final regime is characterized by two minima whose radii decrease as tau^{0.52 \pm 0.11}. These results are in excellent agreement with previous measurements of breakup in the nematic phase of liquid crystal 8CB and 5CB. Interestingly, we find that the entire thinning behavior can also be fit with an exponential decay such that R_{min} \sim exp((1.2\times 10^2 Hz) tau). This dependence is more reminiscent of breakup in polymers where entropic stretching slows the thinning process. An analogous mechanism for slowing in liquid crystals could arise from the role played by topological constraints governing defect dynamics. Consistent with this interpretation, crossed polarizer images indicate that significant alignment of the liquid crystal domains occurs during breakup.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.