Paper detail

Dreaming Awake: Disentangling the Underlying Physics in Case of a SUSY-like Discovery at the LHC

The purpose of this review is to investigate what kind of physics can be extracted at the LHC, assuming a discovery is made in events with missing transverse momentum, as generically expected in supersymmetry (SUSY) with R-parity conservation. To set the scene, we first discuss the collider phenomenology of the six possible electroweakino benchmark scenarios, as they provide valuable insight into what one might be facing at the LHC. We review the existing methods for mass reconstruction from measured kinematic endpoints in the distributions of suitable variables, e.g., the invariant masses of various sets of visible decay products, as well as the $M_{T2}$ and the $M_2$ types of variables. We propose to extend the application of these methods to the various topologies of fully hadronic final states, possibly with hadronically reconstructed massive bosons (W, Z or h). We test the idea with a simplified simulation of events in the main electroweakino benchmark scenarios. We find that the fully hadronic events allow the complete determination of the relevant mass spectrum. For comparison, we also review the potential of the standard kinematic endpoint methods for final states involving leptons from the decays of (on-shell or off-shell) sleptons. We find that with 300 $fb^{-1}$, the statistics for the leptonic events is very marginal and they look less promising than the fully hadronic channels. This corresponds to a complete reversal of the usual paradigm, where leptonic events comprised the gold-plated SUSY channels. Finally, we put together all available information and summarize what level of understanding of the underlying physics can be achieved. We show that, as a by-product of the mass reconstruction, it is also possible to determine the production cross sections and decay branching ratios, which in turn enable us to pinpoint the underlying model.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.