Paper detail

Dp-finite fields IV: the rank 2 picture

We investigate fields of characteristic 0 and dp-rank 2. While we do not obtain a classification, we prove that any unstable field of characteristic 0 and dp-rank 2 admits a unique definable V-topology. If this statement could be generalized to higher ranks, we would obtain the expected classification of fields of finite dp-rank. We obtain the unique definable V-topology by investigating the "canonical topology" defined in earlier work. Contrary to earlier expectations, the canonical topology need not be a V-topology. However, we are able to characterize the canonical topology (on fields of dp-rank 2 and characteristic 0) in terms of differential valued fields. This differential valued structure is obtained through a partial classification of "2-inflators," a sort of generalized valuation that arises naturally in fields of finite rank. Additionally, we give an example of a dp-rank 2 expansion of ACVF with a definable set of full rank and empty interior. This example interferes with certain strategies for proving the henselianity conjecture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.