Abstract

Classical problems in hypergraph coloring theory are to estimate the minimum number of edges, m2(r)m_2(r) (respectively, m2∗(r)m^\ast_2(r)), in a non-22-colorable rr-uniform (respectively, rr-uniform and simple) hypergraph. The best currently known bounds are c⋅r/log⁡r⋅2r ⩽ m2(r) ⩽ C⋅r2⋅2randc′⋅r−ε⋅4r ⩽ m2∗(r) ⩽ C′⋅r4⋅4r,c \cdot \sqrt{r/\log r} \cdot 2^r \,\leqslant\, m_2(r) \,\leqslant\, C \cdot r^2 \cdot 2^r \qquad \text{and} \qquad c' \cdot r^{-\varepsilon} \cdot 4^r \,\leqslant\, m_2^\ast(r) \,\leqslant\, C' \cdot r^4 \cdot 4^r, for any fixed ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and some cc, c′c', CC, C′>0C' > 0 (where c′c' may depend on ε\varepsilon). In this paper we consider the same problems in the context of DP-coloring (also known as correspondence coloring), which is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle and related to local conflict coloring studied independently by Fraigniaud, Heinrich, and Kosowski. Let m~2(r)\tilde{m}_2(r) (respectively, m~2∗(r)\tilde{m}^\ast_2(r)) denote the minimum number of edges in a non-22-DP-colorable rr-uniform (respectively, rr-uniform and simple) hypergraph. By definition, m~2(r)⩽m2(r)\tilde{m}_2(r) \leqslant m_2(r) and m~2∗(r)⩽m2∗(r)\tilde{m}^\ast_2(r)\leqslant m^\ast_2(r). While the proof of the bound m2∗(r)=Ω(r−34r)m^\ast_2(r) = Ω( r^{-3} 4^r) due to Erdős and Lovász also works for m~2∗(r)\tilde{m}^\ast_2(r), we show that the trivial lower bound m~2(r)⩾2r−1\tilde{m}_2(r) \geqslant 2^{r-1} is asymptotically tight, i.e., m~2(r)⩽(1+o(1))2r−1\tilde{m}_2(r) \leqslant (1 + o(1))2^{r-1}. On the other hand, when r⩾2r \geqslant 2 is even, we prove that the lower bound m~2(r)⩾2r−1\tilde{m}_2(r) \geqslant 2^{r-1} is not sharp, i.e., m~2(r)⩾2r−1+1\tilde{m}_2(r) \geqslant 2^{r-1}+1. Whether this result holds for any odd values of rr remains an open problem. Nevertheless, we conjecture that the difference m~2(r)−2r−1\tilde{m}_2(r) - 2^{r-1} can be arbitrarily large.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.