Paper detail

Downlink SCMA Codebook Design with Low Error Rate by Maximizing Minimum Euclidean Distance of Superimposed Codewords

Sparse code multiple access (SCMA), as a codebook-based non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) technique, has received research attention in recent years. The codebook design problem for SCMA has also been studied to some extent since codebook choices are highly related to the system's error rate performance. In this paper, we approach the SCMA codebook design problem by formulating an optimization problem to maximize the minimum Euclidean distance (MED) of superimposed codewords under power constraints. While SCMA codebooks with a larger MED are expected to obtain a better BER performance, no optimal SCMA codebook in terms of MED maximization, to the authors' best knowledge, has been reported in the SCMA literature yet. In this paper, a new iterative algorithm based on alternating maximization with exact penalty is proposed for the MED maximization problem. The proposed algorithm, when supplied with appropriate initial points and parameters, achieves a set of codebooks of all users whose MED is larger than any previously reported results. A Lagrange dual problem is derived which provides an upper bound of MED of any set of codebooks. Even though there is still a nonzero gap between the achieved MED and the upper bound given by the dual problem, simulation results demonstrate clear advantages in error rate performances of the proposed set of codebooks over all existing ones not only in AWGN channels but also in some downlink scenarios that fit in 5G/NR applications, making it a good codebook candidate thereof. The proposed set of SCMA codebooks, however, are not shown to outperform existing ones in uplink channels or in the case where non-consecutive OFDMA subcarriers are used. The correctness and accuracy of error curves in the simulation results are further confirmed by the coincidences with the theoretical upper bounds of error rates derived for any given set of codebooks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.