Paper detail

Double Multi-Head Attention for Speaker Verification

Most state-of-the-art Deep Learning systems for speaker verification are based on speaker embedding extractors. These architectures are commonly composed of a feature extractor front-end together with a pooling layer to encode variable-length utterances into fixed-length speaker vectors. In this paper we present Double Multi-Head Attention pooling, which extends our previous approach based on Self Multi-Head Attention. An additional self attention layer is added to the pooling layer that summarizes the context vectors produced by Multi-Head Attention into a unique speaker representation. This method enhances the pooling mechanism by giving weights to the information captured for each head and it results in creating more discriminative speaker embeddings. We have evaluated our approach with the VoxCeleb2 dataset. Our results show 6.09% and 5.23% relative improvement in terms of EER compared to Self Attention pooling and Self Multi-Head Attention, respectively. According to the obtained results, Double Multi-Head Attention has shown to be an excellent approach to efficiently select the most relevant features captured by the CNN-based front-ends from the speech signal.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.