Paper detail

Double Gamma-ray Lines from Unassociated Fermi-LAT Sources

Gamma ray emission from dark matter subhalos in the Milky Way has long been sought as a sign of dark matter particle annihilation. So far, searches for gamma-ray continuum from subhalos have been unsuccessful, and line searches are difficult without prior knowledge of the line energies. Guided by recent claims of line emission at 111 GeV and 129 GeV in the Galactic center, we examine the co-added gamma-ray spectrum of unassociated point sources in the Second Fermi-LAT catalog (2FGL) using 3.9 years of LAT data. Using the SOURCE event class, we find evidence for lines at 111 GeV and 129 GeV with a local significance of 3.3 sigma based on a conservative estimate of the background at E>135 GeV. Other 2FGL sources analyzed in the same way do not show line emission at 111 GeV and 129 GeV. The line-emitting sources are mostly within 30 degrees of the Galactic plane, although this anisotropy may be a selection effect. If the double-line emission from these objects is confirmed with future data, it will provide compelling support for the hypothesis that the Galactic center line signal is indeed from dark matter annihilation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.