Paper detail

Double Counting in $2^t$-ary RSA Precomputation Reveals the Secret Exponent

A new fault attack, double counting attack (DCA), on the precomputation of $2^t$-ary modular exponentiation for a classical RSA digital signature (i.e., RSA without the Chinese remainder theorem) is proposed. The $2^t$-ary method is the most popular and widely used algorithm to speed up the RSA signature process. Developers can realize the fastest signature process by choosing optimum $t$. For example, $t=6$ is optimum for a 1536-bit classical RSA implementation. The $2^t$-ary method requires precomputation to generate small exponentials of message. Conventional fault attack research has paid little attention to precomputation, even though precomputation could be a target of a fault attack. The proposed DCA induces faults in precomputation by using instruction skip technique, which is equivalent to replacing an instruction with a no operation in assembly language. This paper also presents a useful "position checker" tool to determine the position of the $2^t$-ary coefficients of the secret exponent from signatures based on faulted precomputations. The DCA is demonstrated to be an effective attack method for some widely used parameters. DCA can reconstruct an entire secret exponent using the position checker with $63(=2^6-1)$ faulted signatures in a short time for a 1536-bit RSA implementation using the $2^6$-ary method. The DCA process can be accelerated for a small public exponent (e.g., 65537). The the best of our knowledge, the proposed DCA is the first fault attack against classical RSA precomputation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.