Paper detail

Double and single recycled pulsars: an evolutionary puzzle?

We investigate the statistics of isolated recycled pulsars and double neutron star binaries in the Galactic disk. Since recycled pulsars are believed to form through accretion and spinup in close binaries, the isolated objects presumably originate from disrupted progenitors of double neutron stars. There are a comparable number of double neutron star systems compared to isolated recycled pulsars. We find that standard evolutionary models cannot explain this fact, predicting several times the number of isolated recycled pulsars than those in double neutron star systems. We demonstrate, through population synthesis calculations, that the velocity distribution of isolated recycled pulsars is broader than for binary systems. When this is accounted for in a model for radio pulsar survey selection effects, which include the effects of Doppler smearing for the double neutron star binaries, we find that there is a small (25%) bias towards the detection of double neutron star systems. This bias, however, is not significant enough to explain the observational discrepancy if standard (sigma = 265 km/s) neutron star natal kick velocities are invoked in binary population syntheses. Population syntheses in which the 1D Maxwellian velocity dispersion of the natal kick is sigma=170 km/s are consistent with the observations. These conclusions further support earlier findings the neutron stars formed in close interacting binaries receive significantly smaller natal kicks than the velocities of Galactic single pulsars would seem to indicate.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.