Paper detail

Doppler Tomographic Measurement of the Nodal Precession of WASP-33b

WASP-33b is a retrograde hot Jupiter with a period of 1.2 days orbiting around a rapidly rotating and pulsating A-type star. A previous study found that the transit chord of WASP-33b had changed slightly from 2008 to 2014 based on Doppler tomographic measurements. They attributed the change to orbital precession caused by the non-zero oblateness of the host star and the misaligned orbit. We aim to confirm and more precisely model the precession behavior using additional Doppler tomographic data of WASP-33b obtained with the High Dispersion Spectrograph on the 8.2m Subaru telescope in 2011, as well as the datasets used in the previous study. Using equations of a long-term orbital precession, we constrain the stellar gravitational quadrupole moment $J_{2}=(9.14\pm 0.51)\times 10^{-5}$ and the angle between the stellar spin axis and the line of sight $i_{\star}=96^{+10}_{-14}$ deg. These values update that the host star is more spherical and viewed more equator than the previous study. We also estimate that the precession period is $\sim$840 years. We also find that the precession amplitude of WASP-33b is $\sim$67 deg and WASP-33b transits in front of the host star for only $\sim$20\% of the whole precession period.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.