Paper detail

Domination game: effect of edge- and vertex-removal

The domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, named Dominator and Staller. They alternatively select vertices of $G$ such that each chosen vertex enlarges the set of vertices dominated before the move on it. Dominator's goal is that the game is finished as soon as possible, while Staller wants the game to last as long as possible. It is assumed that both play optimally. Game 1 and Game 2 are variants of the game in which Dominator and Staller has the first move, respectively. The game domination number $γ_g(G)$, and the Staller-start game domination number $γ_g'(G)$, is the number of vertices chosen in Game 1 and Game 2, respectively. It is proved that if $e\in E(G)$, then $|γ_g(G) - γ_g(G-e)| \le 2$ and $|γ_g'(G) - γ_g'(G-e)| \le 2$, and that each of the possibilities here is realizable by connected graphs $G$ for all values of $γ_g(G)$ and $γ_g'(G)$ larger than 5. For the remaining small values it is either proved that realizations are not possible or realizing examples are provided. It is also proved that if $v\in V(G)$, then $γ_g(G) - γ_g(G-v) \le 2$ and $γ_g'(G) - γ_g'(G-v) \le 2$. Possibilities here are again realizable by connected graphs $G$ in almost all the cases, the exceptional values are treated similarly as in the edge-removal case.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.