Paper detail

Dominating sequences under atomic changes with applications in Sierpiński and interval graphs

A sequence $S=(v_1,\ldots,v_k)$ of distinct vertices of a graph $G$ is called a legal sequence if $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1}N[v_j]\not=\emptyset$ for any $i$. The maximum length of a legal (dominating) sequence in $G$ is called the Grundy domination number $γ_{gr}(G)$ of a graph $G$. It is known that the problem of determining the Grundy domination number is NP-complete in general, while efficient algorithm exist for trees and some other classes of graphs. In this paper we find an efficient algorithm for the Grundy domination number of an interval graph. We also show the exact value of the Grundy domination number of an arbitrary Sierpiński graph $S_p^n$, and present algorithms to construct the corresponding sequence. These results are obtained by using the main result of the paper, which are sharp bounds for the Grundy domination number of a vertex- and edge-removed graph. That is, given a graph $G$, $e\in E(G)$, and $u\in V(G)$, we prove that $γ_{gr}(G)-1\le γ_{gr}(G-e) \le γ_{gr}(G)+1$ and $γ_{gr}(G)-2\le γ_{gr}(G-u) \le γ_{gr}(G)$. For each of the bounds there exist graphs, in which all three possibilities occur for different edges, respectively vertices.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.