Paper detail

Dominated Minimal Separators are Tame (Nearly All Others are Feral)

A class ${\cal F}$ of graphs is called {\em tame} if there exists a constant $k$ so that every graph in ${\cal F}$ on $n$ vertices contains at most $O(n^k)$ minimal separators, {\em strongly-quasi-tame} if every graph in ${\cal F}$ on $n$ vertices contains at most $O(n^{k \log n})$ minimal separators, and {\em feral} if there exists a constant $c > 1$ so that ${\cal F}$ contains $n$-vertex graphs with at least $c^n$ minimal separators for arbitrarily large $n$. The classification of graph classes into tame or feral has numerous algorithmic consequences, and has recently received considerable attention. A key graph-theoretic object in the quest for such a classification is the notion of a $k$-{\em creature}. In a recent manuscript [Abrishami et al., Arxiv 2020] conjecture that every hereditary class ${\cal F}$ that excludes $k$-creatures for some fixed constant $k$ is tame. We give a counterexample to this conjecture and prove the weaker result that a hereditary class ${\cal F}$ is strongly quasi-tame if it excludes $k$-creatures for some fixed constant $k$ and additionally every minimal separator can be dominated by another fixed constant $k'$ number of vertices. The tools developed also lead to a number of additional results of independent interest. {\bf (i) We obtain a complete classification of all hereditary graph classes defined by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs into strongly quasi-tame or feral. This generalizes Milanič and Pivač [WG'19]. {\bf (ii)} We show that hereditary class that excludes $k$-creatures and additionally excludes all cycles of length at least $c$, for some constant $c$, are tame. This generalizes the result of [Chudnovsky et al., Arxiv 2019]. {\bf (iii)} We show that every hereditary class that excludes $k$-creatures and additionally excludes a complete graph on $c$ vertices for some fixed constant $c$ is tame.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.