Paper detail

Dominant 1/m_c Contribution To The Mass Difference in D0-D0bar Mixing

We re-visit the problem of non-perturbative contribution to the mass difference in D0-D0bar mixing within the Standard Model (SM). There are two known approaches to take this contribution into account. In the long long-distance approach one analyzes contribution to the D0-D0bar from exclusive channels due to production of intermediate charmless hadronic states. In the short-distance approach one employs the Operator Product Expansion (OPE) techniques with the non-perturbative contribution coming from the diagrams containing low energy-momentum quark states - quark-antiquark condensates. Within the latter approach, the non-perturbative contribution to the normalized mass difference in D0-D0bar mixing, x_D = Delta M_D / Gamma_D, is estimated to be few x 10^{-3}, that is to say very close to the experimental value of x_D. We attempt to verify quantitatively this estimate here. We find that the actual prediction of the short-distance approach is few times less than the estimate above and order of magnitude less than the experimental value of x_D.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.