Paper detail

Dominance of Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables in the Resolved Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission of the Limiting Window

The diffuse appearance of the Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE) has been puzzling since its discovery due to lack of compelling theories for sustainable hot diffuse X-ray emission in the Galactic plane. Recently (Revnivtsev et al. 2009; R09) claimed that about 90% of the 6.5-7.1 keV X-ray flux from a small section of a low extinction region at 1.4 degree south of the Galactic Center has been resolved to discrete sources with 2-10 keV L_X > 4x10^{-16} erg s cm^-2, using ultra-deep (1 Ms) Chandra ACIS-I observations. They also concluded thatcoronally active stars such as active binaries (ABs) contribute about 60% of the resolved flux. However, our recent discovery of a large population of magnetic cataclysmic variables (MCVs) in the same region suggests their significant role in the resolved hard X-ray flux. In addition, deep X-ray surveys of other several Galactic Bulge fields over the past decade have indicated that MCVs are likely the major contributor in the hard X-ray emission above 2-3 keV. To solve this mystery, we have conducted an independent indepth analysis of discrete X-ray sources in the low extinction region. The total fraction of the 6.5-7.1 keV flux we can confidently claim as resolved is 70-80%, which largely agrees with R09 but leaves some room for diffuse components. However, despite the various attempts, we consistently find that the resolved hard X-ray flux above 3 keV is dominated by relatively bright, hard X-ray sources such as MCVs, whereas the contribution from relatively faint, soft sources such as ABs is below 20%. We describe in detail our analysis procedure in order to elucidate possible origins of the discrepancy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.