Paper detail

Domain walls of ferroelectric BaTiO3 within the Ginzburg-Landau-Devonshire phenomenological model

Mechanically compatible and electrically neutral domain walls in tetragonal, orthorhombic and rhombohedral ferroelectric phases of BaTiO3 are systematically investigated in the framework of the phenomenological Ginzburg-Landau-Devonshire (GLD) model with parameters of Ref. [Hlinka and Marton, Phys. Rev. 74, 104104 (2006)]. Polarization and strain profiles within domain walls are calculated numerically and within an approximation leading to the quasi-one-dimensional analytic solutions applied previously to the ferroelectric walls of the tetragonal phase [W. Cao and L.E. Cross, Phys. Rev. 44, 5 (1991)]. Domain wall thicknesses and energy densities are estimated for all mechanically compatible and electrically neutral domain wall species in the entire temperature range of ferroelectric phases. The model suggests that the lowest energy walls in the orthorhombic phase of BaTiO3 are the 90-degree and 60-degree walls. In the rhombohedral phase, the lowest energy walls are the 71-degree and 109-degree walls. All these ferroelastic walls have thickness below 1 nm except for the 90-degree wall in the tetragonal phase and the 60-degree S-wall in the orthorhombic phase, for which the larger thickness of the order of 5 nm was found. The antiparallel walls of the rhombohedral phase have largest energy and thus they are unlikely to occur. The calculation indicates that the lowest energy structure of the 109-degree wall and few other domain walls in the orthorhombic and rhombohedral phases resemble Bloch-like walls known from magnetism.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.