Paper detail

Domain-specific Language Pre-training for Dialogue Comprehension on Clinical Inquiry-Answering Conversations

There is growing interest in the automated extraction of relevant information from clinical dialogues. However, it is difficult to collect and construct large annotated resources for clinical dialogue tasks. Recent developments in natural language processing suggest that large-scale pre-trained language backbones could be leveraged for such machine comprehension and information extraction tasks. Yet, due to the gap between pre-training and downstream clinical domains, it remains challenging to exploit the generic backbones for domain-specific applications. Therefore, in this work, we propose a domain-specific language pre-training, to improve performance on downstream tasks like dialogue comprehension. Aside from the common token-level masking pre-training method, according to the nature of human conversations and interactive flow of multi-topic inquiry-answering dialogues, we further propose sample generation strategies with speaker and utterance manipulation. The conversational pre-training guides the language backbone to reconstruct the utterances coherently based on the remaining context, thus bridging the gap between general and specific domains. Experiments are conducted on a clinical conversation dataset for symptom checking, where nurses inquire and discuss symptom information with patients. We empirically show that the neural model with our proposed approach brings improvement in the dialogue comprehension task, and can achieve favorable results in the low resource training scenario.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.