Paper detail

Domain of validity for pseudo-elliptical NFW lens models

Models with elliptical potentials (pseudo-elliptical) are often used in gravitational lensing applications. Nevertheless, they generally lead to nonphysical mass distributions in some regions. In this paper we revisit the physical limitations of the pseudo-elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White (PNFW) model, for a broad range of the potential ellipticity parameter ε and characteristic convergence κ_s focusing on the behavior of the mass distribution close to the tangential critical curve, where tangential arcs are expected to be formed. We investigate the shape of the mass distribution on this region and the presence of negative convergence. We obtain a mapping from the PNFW to the NFW model with elliptical mass distribution (ENFW) and provide fitting formulae for connecting the parameters of both models. We compare the arc cross section for these models using the "infinitesimal circular source approximation". We find that the PNFW model is well-suited to model an elliptical mass distribution on a larger ε - κ_s parameter space than previously expected. In particular values as large as ε ~ 0.65 are allowed for small κ_s. However, if we require the PNFW model to reproduce the arc cross section of the ENFW well, the ellipticity is more restricted. We also find that the negative convergence regions occur far from the arc formation region and should therefore not be a problem for studies with gravitational arcs. The determination of a domain of validity for the PNFW model and the mapping to ENFW models could have implications for the use of PNFW models for the inverse modeling of lenses and for fast arc simulations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.