Paper detail

Does Phylogenetic Proximity Explain Nestedness in Mutualistic Ecosystems?

We investigate how the pattern of contacts between species in mutualistic ecosystems is affected by the phylogenetic proximity between the species of each guild. We develop a dynamical model geared to establish the role of such proximity in the emergence of a nested pattern of contacts. We also define a parameter that provides a direct measure of the influence of phylogenetic proximity in a given pattern of contacts. We conclude that although phylogenetic proximity is compatible with nestedness it can not be claimed to be a cause of it. We find that nestedness can instead be attributed to a general rule by which species tend to hold contacts with counterparts that already have a large number of contacts. If the phylogenetic structure of both guilds is brought into the analysis, this rule is equivalent to maximize the phylogenetic diversity of the mutualistic counterparts of species of either guild.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.