Paper detail

Does Gravitational Clustering Stabilize On Small Scales?

The stable clustering hypothesis is a key analytical anchor on the nonlinear dynamics of gravitational clustering in cosmology. It states that on sufficiently small scales the mean pair velocity approaches zero, or equivalently, that the mean number of neighbours of a particle remains constant in time at a given physical separation. In this paper we use N-body simulations of scale free spectra P(k) \propto k^n with -2 \leq n \leq 0 and of the CDM spectrum to test for stable clustering using the time evolution and shape of the correlation function ξ(x,t), and the mean pair velocity on small scales. For all spectra the results are consistent with the stable clustering predictions on the smallest scales probed, x < 0.07 x_{nl}(t), where x_{nl}(t) is the correlation length. The measured stable clustering regime corresponds to a typical range of 200 \lsim ξ\lsim 2000, though spectra with more small scale power approach the stable clustering asymptote at larger values of ξ. We test the amplitude of ξpredicted by the analytical model of Sheth \& Jain (1996), and find agreement to within 20\% in the stable clustering regime for nearly all spectra. For the CDM spectrum the nonlinear ξis accurately approximated by this model with n \simeq -2 on physical scales \lsim 100-300 h^{-1} kpc for σ_8 = 0.5-1, and on smaller scales at earlier times. The growth of ξfor CDM-like models is discussed in the context of a power law parameterization often used to describe galaxy clustering at high redshifts. The growth parameter εis computed as a function of time and length scale, and found to be larger than 1 in the moderately nonlinear regime -- thus the growth of ξis much faster on scales of interest than is commonly assumed.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.