Paper detail

Does Bose-Einstein condensation of CMB photons cancel μ distortions created by dissipation of sound waves in the early Universe?

The difference in the adiabatic indices of photons and non-relativistic baryonic matter in the early Universe causes the electron temperature to be slightly lower than the radiation temperature. Thermalization of photons with a colder plasma results in the accumulation of photons in the Rayleigh-Jeans tail, aided by stimulated recoil, while the higher frequency spectrum tries to approach Planck spectrum at the electron temperature $T_γ^{final}=\Te<T_γ^{initial}$; i.e., Bose-Einstein condensation of photons occurs. We find new solutions of the Kompaneets equation describing this effect. No actual condensate is, in reality, possible since the process is very slow and photons drifting to low frequencies are efficiently absorbed by bremsstrahlung and double Compton processes. The spectral distortions created by Bose-Einstein condensation of photons are within an order of magnitude (for the present range of allowed cosmological parameters), with exactly the same spectrum but opposite in sign, of those created by diffusion damping of the acoustic waves on small scales corresponding to comoving wavenumbers $45< k< 10^4\, Mpc^{-1}$. The initial perturbations on these scales are completely unobservable today due to their being erased completely by Silk damping. There is partial cancellation of these two distortions, leading to suppression of $μ$ distortions expected in the standard model of cosmology. The net distortion depends on the scalar power index $n_S$ and its running $d n_S/d\ln k$, and may vanish for special values of parameters, for example, for a running spectrum with, $n_S=1,d n_S/d\ln k=-0.038$. We arrive at an intriguing conclusion: even a null result, non-detection of $μ$-type distortion at a sensitivity of $10^{-9}$, gives a quantitative measure of the primordial small-scale power spectrum.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.