Paper detail

Does a PESQNet (Loss) Require a Clean Reference Input? The Original PESQ Does, But ACR Listening Tests Don't

Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) requires a clean speech reference as input, but predicts the results from (reference-free) absolute category rating (ACR) tests. In this work, we train a fully convolutional recurrent neural network (FCRN) as deep noise suppression (DNS) model, with either a non-intrusive or an intrusive PESQNet, where only the latter has access to a clean speech reference. The PESQNet is used as a mediator providing a perceptual loss during the DNS training to maximize the PESQ score of the enhanced speech signal. For the intrusive PESQNet, we investigate two topologies, called early-fusion (EF) and middle-fusion (MF) PESQNet, and compare to the non-intrusive PESQNet to evaluate and to quantify the benefits of employing a clean speech reference input during DNS training. Detailed analyses show that the DNS trained with the MF-intrusive PESQNet outperforms the Interspeech 2021 DNS Challenge baseline and the same DNS trained with an MSE loss by 0.23 and 0.12 PESQ points, respectively. Furthermore, we can show that only marginal benefits are obtained compared to the DNS trained with the non-intrusive PESQNet. Therefore, as ACR listening tests, the PESQNet does not necessarily require a clean speech reference input, opening the possibility of using real data for DNS training.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.