Paper detail

Do we really know how to derive the basic PNe parameters?

How well do we know the physical/chemical properties of PNe? 1D (CLOUDY) and 3D (MOCASSIN) photoionisation codes are used in this contribution to model the PNe K 4-47 and NGC 7009 as an attempt to question whether or not the high Te (higher than 21,000K) of the K 4-47's core and the N overabundance of the outer knots in NGC 7009 are real. These are very basic parameters, obtained for Galactic PNe, e.g. nearby objects, even though with large uncertainties. Based on the comparison of the modelling with, mainly, optical images and long-slit spectroscopic data, it is suggested here that K 4-47 high Te can be explained if its core is composed of a very dense and small inner region --that matches the radio measurements-- and a lower density outer core --matching the optical observations. This approach can account for the strong auroral emission lines [OIII]4363A and [NII]5755A observed, and so for the high temperatures. This teaches us that the assumption of a homogeneous distribution of the gas is completely wrong for the core of such PN. In the case of NGC 7009 a simple 3D model that reproduces the observed geometry of this nebula is constructed. The aim of this modelling was to explore the possibility that the enhanced [NII] emission observed in the outer knots may be due to ionisation effects instead to a local N overabundance. Here it is discussed the model that can best reproduce the observations employing a homogeneous set of abundances throughout the nebula, not only for nitrogen but also for all the other elements considered.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.