Paper detail

Do we have the explanation for the Higgs and Yukawa couplings of the standard model?

The spin-charge-family theory offers a possible explanation for the assumptions of the standard model, interpreting the standard model as its low energy effective manifestation. The theory predicts several scalar fields determining masses and mixing matrices of fermions and weak bosons. The scalar fields manifest as doublets with respect to the weak charge, while they are triplets with respect to the family quantum numbers. Since free scalar fields (mass eigen states) differ from those which couple to $Z_m$ and to $W^{\pm}_{m}$ or to each family member of each of the family the spin-charge-family theory predictions for LHC might differ from those of the standard model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.