Paper detail

Do Ultraluminous X-ray Sources Really Contain Intermediate-mass Black Holes?

An open question remains whether Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) really contain intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs). We carefully investigated the XMM-Newton EPIC spectra of the four ULXs that were claimed to be strong candidates of IMBHs by several authors. We first tried fitting by the standard spectral model of disk blackbody (DBB) + power-law (PL), finding good fits to all of the data, in agreement with others. We, however, found that the PL component dominates the DBB component at $\sim$ 0.3 to 10 keV. Thus, the black hole parameters derived solely from the minor DBB component are questionable. Next, we tried to fit the same data by the ``$p$-free disk model'' without the PL component, assuming the effective temperature profile of $T_{\rm eff} \propto r^{-p}$ where $r$ is the disk radius. Interestingly, in spite of one less free model parameters, we obtained similarly good fits with much higher innermost disk temperatures, $1.8 < kT_{\rm in} < 3.2$ keV. More importantly, we obtained $p \sim 0.5$, just the value predicted by the slim (super-critical) disk theory, rather than $p = 0.75$ that is expected from the standard disk model. The estimated black hole masses from the $p$-free disk model are much smaller; $M\ltsim 40 M_\odot$. Furthermore, we applied a more sophisticated slim disk model by Kawaguchi (2003, ApJ, 593,69), and obtained good fits with roughly consistent black hole masses. We thus conclude that the central engines of these ULXs are super-critical accretion flows to stellar-mass black holes.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.