Paper detail

Do subsequent outbursts of the same EXor source present similar features?

V1118 Ori is a classical EXor source whose light curve has been monitored over the past thirty years (although not continuously). It underwent a powerful outburst in 2005, followed by ten years of quiescence and a less intense outburst in 2015. In 2019, a new intense brightness increase was observed ($Δg$ $\sim$ 3 mag). This new accretion episode offers the opportunity to compare the photometric and spectroscopic properties of different outbursts of the same source. This allows one to highlight differences and similarities among different events by removing any possible bias related to the intrinsic properties of the star-disk system. We discovered the 2019 V1118 Ori outburst by examining the $g$-band light curve acquired by the Zwicky Transient Facility and followed the decreasing phase with the Rapid Eye Mount telescope in the $griz$ bands. Two near-infrared spectra were also acquired at different brightness stages with the Large Binocular Telescope. The last event shows the following characteristics: 1) amplitude similar than in 2015 and lower than in 2005; 2) duration less than one year as in previous events; 3) rise (decline) speed of 0.018 (0.031) mag/day, which is different from previous cases; 4) a gradual blueing of the [$g-r$] color is observed over time, while the [$r-i$] color remains roughly unchanged; 5) with few exceptions, the near-infrared lines (mainly HI recombination) are the same observed in 2015; 6) the mass accretion rate peaks at Macc $\sim$ 10$^{-7}$ Msun/yr, and decreases in about a month down to a few 10$^{-8}$ Msun/yr. Our analysis shows that the comparison of data from different outbursts of the same source is a non-trivial exercise, which allows obtaining important clues useful to drive theoretical efforts towards a better understanding of the EXor phenomenon.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.