Paper detail

Do novae have optically thick winds during outburst with large deviations from spherical symmetry?

The evidence for the presence of optically thick winds, produced by classical novae after optical maximum, has been challenged in recent papers. In addition, signs of orbital phase dependent photometric variations, sometimes seen quite early in the development of nova outbursts, are hard to interpret in the framework of optically thick envelopes and especially winds. A general discussion for belief in the presence of optically thick winds with increasing ejection velocities during the early stages of novae after their explosion, must be given. This has to be done in order to clarify ideas about novae as well as to contribute in particular to the understanding of the behaviour of novae V1500 Cyg and V1493 Aql showing phase dependent variations during very early decline after the outburst. Possible ways of overcoming the apparent contradiction of phase dependent variations through the production of deviations from spherical symmetry of the winds, are looked at and order of magnitude estimates are made for different theoretical scenarios, which might produce such deviations. It is found that large deviations from spherical symmetry of the optically thick winds in early phases after the explosion can easily explain the problem of variations. In particular, the presence of a magnetic field might have had a non-negligible effect on the wind of V1500 Cyg, while at the present there is not enough information available concerning V1493 Aql. Optically thick winds/envelopes are almost certainly present in the early stages after optical maximum of a nova, while it is difficult to make pure Hubble flow models fit the observations of those stages. New more detailed observational and theoretical work, in particular including the effects of magnetic fields on the winds, is needed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.