Paper detail

Do Most Active Galactic Nuclei Live in High Star Formation Nuclear Cusps?

We present early results of the Herschel PACS (70 and 160 \micron{}) and SPIRE (250, 350, and 500 \micron{}) survey of 313 low redshift ($\rm{z} < 0.05$), ultra-hard X-ray (14--195 keV) selected AGN from the 58 month Swift/BAT catalog. Selection of AGN from ultra-hard X-rays avoids bias from obscuration providing a complete sample of AGN to study the connection between nuclear activity and star formation in host galaxies. With the high angular resolution of PACS, we find that $>$35\%$ and $>$20\%$ of the sources are "point-like" at 70 and 160 \micron{} respectively and many more that have their flux dominated by a point source located at the nucleus. The inferred star formation rates (SFR) of 0.1 - 100 M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ using the 70 and 160 \micron{} flux densities as SFR indicators are consistent with those inferred from Spitzer NeII fluxes, but we find that 11.25 \micron{} PAH data give $\sim$3x lower SFR. Using GALFIT to measure the size of the FIR emitting regions, we determined the SFR surface density [M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$] for our sample, finding a significant fraction of these sources exceed the threshold for star formation driven winds (0.1 M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.