Paper detail

Do micro brown dwarf detections explain the galactic dark matter?

Context: The baryonic dark matter dominating the structures of galaxies is widely considered as mysterious, but hints for it have been in fact detected in several astronomical observations at optical, infrared, and radio wavelengths. We call attention to the nature of galaxy merging, the observed rapid microlensing of a quasar, the detection of "cometary knots" in planetary nebulae, and the Lyman-alpha clouds as optical phenomena revealing the compact objects. Radio observations of "extreme scattering events" and "parabolic arcs" and microwave observations of "cold dust cirrus" clouds are observed at 15 - 20 K temperatures are till now not considered in a unifying picture. Aims: The theory of gravitational hydrodynamics predicts galactic dark matter arises from Jeans clusters that are made up of almost a trillion micro brown dwarfs (mBDs) of earth weight. It is intended to explain the aforementioned anomalous observations and to make predictions within this framework. Methods: We employ analytical isothermal modeling to estimate various effects. Results: Estimates of their total number show that they comprise enough mass to constitute the missing baryonic matter. Mysterious radio events are explained by mBD pair merging in the Galaxy. The "dust" temperature of cold galaxy halos arises from a thermostat setting due to a slow release of latent heat at the 14 K gas to solid transition at the mBD surface. The proportionality of the central black hole mass of a galaxy and its number of globular clusters is explained. The visibility of an early galaxy at redshift 8.6 is obvious with most hydrogen locked up in mBDs. Conclusions: Numerical simulations of various steps would further test the approach. It looks promising to redo MACHO searches against the Magellanic clouds.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.