Paper detail

Do High-Velocity Clouds trace the Dark Matter subhalo population?

Within the cosmological concordance model, Cold Dark Matter (CDM) subhalos form the building blocks which merge hierarchically to more massive galaxies. Since intergalactic gas is accreted by massive galaxies, observable e.g. as high- velocity clouds (HVCs) around the Milky Way, with extremely low metallicities, these can be suggested to represent the baryonic content of primordial Dark Matter (DM) subhalos. Another possibility of their origin is that they stem from disrupted satellite galaxies, but in this case, these gas clouds move unaccompanied by a bound DM structure. Since HVCs are observed with long gas tails and with irregular substructures, numerical models are performed aiming at exploring their structure and compare them with observations. If HVCs are engulfed by DM subhalos, their gas must leave the DM gravitational potential and reflect this in their dynamics. On the other hand, the evolution and survival of pure gas models must be tested to distinguish between DM-dominated and DM-free clouds and to allow conclusions on their origin. The models demonstrate that purely baryonic HVCs with low masses are disrupted by ram-pressure stripping and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities, while more massive ones survive, losing their initially spherical shape and develop significant substructures including cometary elongations in the column density distribution ("head-tail structure"). On the contrary, HVCs with DM subhalos survive with more than 90% of their gas mass still bound and spherically shaped, approaching the Galactic disk like bullets. In addition, we find that velocity gradients along the cometary head-tail structures does not necessarily offer a possibility to distinguish between DM-dominated and purely gaseous HVCs. Comparison of models with observations let us conclude that HVCs are not embedded in a DM substructure and do not trace the cosmological subhalo population.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.