Paper detail

Do gravitational lens galaxies have an excess of luminous substructure?

Strong gravitational lensing can be used to directly measure the mass function of their satellites, thus testing one of the fundamental predictions of cold dark matter cosmological models. Given the importance of this test it is essential to ensure that galaxies acting as strong lenses have dark and luminous satellites which are representative of the overall galaxy population. We address this issue by measuring the number and spatial distribution of luminous satellites in ACS imaging around lens galaxies from the Sloan Lens Advanced Camera for Surveys (SLACS) lenses, and comparing them with the satellite population in ACS imaging of non lens galaxies selected from COSMOS, which has similar depth and resolution to the ACS images of SLACS lenses. In order to compare the samples of lens and non lens galaxies, which have intrinsically different stellar mass distributions, we measure, for the first time, the number of satellites per host as a continuous function of host stellar mass for both populations. We find that the number of satellites as a function of host stellar mass, as well as the spatial distribution are consistent between the samples. Using these results, we predict the number of satellites we would expect to find around a subset of the Cosmic Lens All Sky Survey (CLASS) lenses, and find a result consistent with the the number observed by Jackson et al. 2010. Thus we conclude that within our measurement uncertainties there is no significant difference in the satellite populations of lens and non lens galaxies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.