Paper detail

Do algebraic numbers follow Khinchin's Law?

The coefficients of the regular continued fraction for random numbers are distributed by the Gauss-Kuzmin distribution according to Khinchin's law. Their geometric mean converges to Khinchin's constant and their rational approximation speed is Khinchin's speed. It is an open question whether these theorems also apply to algebraic numbers of degree $>2$. Since they apply to almost all numbers it is, however, commonly inferred that it is most likely that non quadratic algebraic numbers also do so. We argue that this inference is not well grounded. There is strong numerical evidence that Khinchin's speed is too fast. For Khinchin's law and Khinchin's constant the numerical evidence is unclear. We apply the Kullback Leibler Divergence (KLD) to show that the Gauss-Kuzmin distribution does not fit well for algebraic numbers of degree $>2$. Our suggestion to truncate the Gauss-Kuzmin distribution for finite parts fits slightly better but its KLD is still much larger than the KLD of a random number. So, if it converges the convergence is non uniform and each algebraic number has its own bound. We conclude that there is no evidence to apply the theorems that hold for random numbers to algebraic numbers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.