Paper detail

DNS-based Ingress Load Balancing: An Experimental Evaluation

Multihomed services can load-balance their incoming connection requests using DNS, resolving the name of the server with different addresses depending on the link load that corresponds to each address. Previous work has studied a number of problems with this approach, e.g., due to Time-to-Live duration violations and client proximity to local DNS servers. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate a DNS-based ingress traffic engineering system that we deployed at Georgia Tech. Our objective is to understand whether simple and robust load balancing algorithms can be accurate in practice, despite aforementioned problems with DNS-based load balancing methods. In particular, we examine the impact of various system parameters and of the main workload characteristics. We show that a window-based measurement scheme can be fairly accurate in practice, as long as its window duration has been appropriately configured.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.