Paper detail

DNN No-Reference PSTN Speech Quality Prediction

Classic public switched telephone networks (PSTN) are often a black box for VoIP network providers, as they have no access to performance indicators, such as delay or packet loss. Only the degraded output speech signal can be used to monitor the speech quality of these networks. However, the current state-of-the-art speech quality models are not reliable enough to be used for live monitoring. One of the reasons for this is that PSTN distortions can be unique depending on the provider and country, which makes it difficult to train a model that generalizes well for different PSTN networks. In this paper, we present a new open-source PSTN speech quality test set with over 1000 crowdsourced real phone calls. Our proposed no-reference model outperforms the full-reference POLQA and no-reference P.563 on the validation and test set. Further, we analyzed the influence of file cropping on the perceived speech quality and the influence of the number of ratings and training size on the model accuracy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.