Paper detail

Divided Differences in Noncommutative Geometry: Rearrangement Lemma, Functional Calculus and Expansional Formula

We state a generalization of the Connes-Tretkoff-Moscovici Rearrangement Lemma and give a surprisingly simple (almost trivial) proof of it. Secondly, we put on a firm ground the multivariable functional calculus used implicitly in the Rearrangement Lemma and elsewhere in the recent modular curvature paper by Connes and Moscovici. Furthermore, we show that the fantastic formulas connecting the one and two variable modular functions of loc. cit. are just examples of the plenty recursion formulas which can be derived from the calculus of divided differences. We show that the functions derived from the main integral occurring in the Rearrangement Lemma can be expressed in terms of divided differences of the Logarithm, generalizing the "modified Logarithm" of Connes-Tretkoff. Finally, we show that several expansion formulas related to the Magnus expansion have a conceptual explanation in terms of a multivariable functional calculus applied to divided differences.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.