Paper detail

Diversified Top-k Similarity Search in Large Attributed Networks

Given a large network and a query node, finding its top-k similar nodes is a primitive operation in many graph-based applications. Recently enhancing search results with diversification have received much attention. In this paper, we explore an novel problem of searching for top-k diversified similar nodes in attributed networks, with the motivation that modeling diversification in an attributed network should consider both the emergence of network links and the attribute features of nodes such as user profile information. We formulate this practical problem as two optimization problems: the Attributed Coverage Diversification (ACD) problem and the r-Dissimilar Attributed Coverage Diversification (r-DACD) problem. Based on the submodularity and the monotonicity of ACD, we propose an efficient greedy algorithm achieving a tight approximation guarantee of 1-1/e. Unlike the expension based methods only considering nodes' neighborhood, ACD generalize the definition of diversification to nodes' own features. To capture diversification in topological structure of networks, the r-DACD problem introduce a dissimilarity constraint. We refer to this problem as the Dissimilarity Constrained Non-monotone Submodular Maximization (DCNSM) problem. We prove that there is no constant-factor approximation for DCNSM, and also present an efficient greedy algorithms achieving $1/ρ$ approximation, where $ρ\leΔ$, $Δ$ is the maximum degree of its dissimilarity based graph. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first approximation algorithm for the Submodular Maximization problem with a distance constraint. The experimental results on real-world attributed network datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods, and confirm that adding dissimilarity constraint can significantly enhance the performance of diversification.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.