Paper detail

Distributional transformations without orthogonality relations

Distributional transformations characterized by equations relating expectations of test functions weighted by a given biasing function on the original distribution to expectations of the test function's higher derivatives with respect to the transformed distribution play a great role in Stein's method and were, in great generality, first considered by Goldstein and Reinert \cite{GolRei05b}. We prove two abstract existence and uniqueness results for such distributional transformations, generalizing their $X-P$ bias transformation. On the one hand, we show how one can abandon previously necessary orthogonality relations by subtracting an explicitly known polynomial depending on the test function from the test function itself. On the other hand, we prove that for a given nonnegative integer $m$ it is possible to obtain the expectation of the $m$-th derivative of the test function with respect to the transformed distribution in the defining equation, even though the biasing function may have $k<m$ sign changes, if these two numbers have the same parity. We explain, how these results can be used to guarantee the existence of two different generalizations of the zero bias transformation by Goldstein and Reinert \cite{GolRei97}. Further applications include the derivation of Stein type characterizations without needing to solve any Stein equation and the presentation of a general framework of estimating the distance of the distribution of a given real random variable $X$ to that of a random variable $Z$, whose distribution is characterized by some $m$-th order linear differential operator. We also explain the fact that, in general, the biased distribution depends on the choice of the sign change points, if these are ambiguous. This new phenomenon does not appear in the framework from \cite{GolRei05b}.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.